Naftoli Gugenheim
Naftoli Gugenheim
@osleonard I don't think so, although @xuwei-k has been doing some tasks, so that would be great. Note that there have been some steps towards scala 3 compatibility on master...
@alexFrankfurt that's great, thanks! What remains to be done and what are your plans?
Me to. Do you want to help move it forward?
That's great! Note that there have been some PRs merged that being us a little closer, such as ones by @xuwei-k adding parentheses and changing Stream to LazyList. It would...
> @nafg I can try to move things forward. Does it still make sense to: (a) rebase this PR on main Yes > (b) move any other changes that don't...
> @nafg sorry, I actually wanted to inform you right after your response that I won't have time to work on this until next week. Anyway... I will start to...
Would be great if there was someone more expert in the codebase to review this... @dontgitit what about Tuple3, Tuple4, etc.? Is Tuple2 much more of a need and if...
Why is that not a Seq[Tuple2[...]] ?
Oh never mind I misunderstood. I think I should be able to review this then.
Can we generalize this? For instance I want to be able to do `(col1, col2) === (val1, val2)` or `(col1, col2) < (val1, val2)`. I believe this is supported by...