Nana Axel

Hey @roipeker, thanks. If needed I can build an example app to showcase the feature. Currently I'm using it in my app (a chat application) to allow users to directly...

I like the idea of a native GBinding support, it will make GTK developers _feels like home_ and also align with official documentation. But I think to another way to...

`.Value` notations can be strange to C# developers since it's not very common to see that. But I really like the idea to have the per property event registration not...

The use of INPC will surely be the right choice to match C# convention and to allow users to move their code from other GUI systems to Gir.Core (or maybe...

@badcel there are some benefits of my proposal: It's almost a fact that the UI ecosystem on C# is XAML-based, with support of reactive programming. I think they are the...

@badcel > Bind(GObject.Object source, string sourcePropertyName, GObject.Object target, string targetPropertyName) > Bind(GObject.Object source, string sourcePropertyName, INotifyPropertyChanged target, string targetPropertyName) I was pretty sure that you will find these alternatives to...

Thank you @badcel and @firox263 for your feedbacks. @badcel > So if you are willing to invest your knowledge and / or coding skills into this project feel free to...

I think regarding this issue, we have to create two RFCs, one for the static properties approach and another one for the data binding. Or may be the static properties...

I think we can change the generator to use unsafe on: - Native methods where we use a closure/callback to use a function pointer instead (thanks to C# 9) -...

Hi @badcel, is the type dictionary not only needed on the generator side ? To fix the issue @firox263 got when tried to generate `SignalArgs` implementations for example...