MithunR
MithunR
I've unassigned myself from this bug. This should be resolved after the missing metrics are addressed.
Taking a look at this one now.
It appears that this is the result of a new, unsupported exec being used to handle BHJs. It will be beyond the scope of this issue to add support. I'm...
Ah, I'm not on @rapidsai/cuvs-cpp-codeowners. @benfred: This might need a quick gander.
/ok to test 0f6df12
Hi, @ldematte. I'll mention this here before @cjnolet does: For RAPIDS projects, the recommendation is not to do force pushes, to prevent review comments from disappearing, etc.
/ok to test c486f11
> in case of a rebase to another branch... Fair point. And in this case, the prior review comments remained intact, so there's no adverse consequence.
Argh. It looks like we need to run `pre-commit` to fix the formatting in the C test file.
/ok to test e0a78ed