Max Mehl

Thank you! I don't know how khard works internally and what the difference between empty and deleted keys is in CardDAV, so I cannot give useful input to your questions...

For the record, I agree to the list brought forward by @carmenbianca. I'm not sure whether the check of REUSE conformance inside FOSSology makes sense as the REUSE helper tool...

I just found this meta issue, and was wondering whether #502 and #464 (a PR but actually an open issue/discussion) would also fit on this list. If I remember correctly,...

Thank you for sharing your thoughts! I cannot comment so much on how to call this, and how this integrates in your current schemes. What I like with the "pre-SPDX"...

@zvr Thanks for your feedback. I cannot say much more about how to integrate it into SPDX but I am happy to give feedback to concrete proposals from a (REUSE)...

Excellent summary, thank you! I just would like to emphasise that this "metadata, pre-document file" is limited to its own directory and its subdirectories. So this file cannot bulk-define attributes...

There are two issues where we can discuss the points raised by @zvr: * fsfe/reuse-docs#81 for the exact syntax of the YAML file, globbing rules and conflict resolution *within* this...

> Per discussion in the call, leaning towards leaving it in 3.0 as it's a profile, but need to sync up with @mxmehl Obviously we'd be happy to have it...

Great! How shall we proceed? I am afraid I lack the required detailed inside knowledge of the SPDX spec to draft a pull request that won't raise too many side...

OK, no promise but I can try to kickstart a pull request creating an annex to get the ball rolling.