Michael Weinberg

The intention was that the this sentence: `If you do not do so, and the ml5.js Code of Conduct Committee (or its equivalent or successor) agrees that you are in...

I really like this idea

I have incorporated @sekrystal's document into the end of the current CoC draft

Thanks @sonatagreen! This was actually something we discussed on the last call. It seems to me that there are (at least) two ways to try and address this concern. I...

I support the impulse to be explicit about this. I am not entirely sure that the CoC is the best place for it (although I am not entirely sure that...

I agree that it would be cleaner to replace it and like the language in #19

Coming back to this (and in light of the resolution of #19), I'm still wondering if this is something that is fixable in an elegant way. I worry that the...

I am inclined towards the more narrow interpretation, essentially for the reasons you suggest. That being said, I am very curious to hear from the rest of the ml5.js team...

We are in the process of adding explicit language to the CoC regarding this. The current thinking is that personal behavior and the nature of projects are essentially distinct. People...

My recollection of the discussion (which may or may not be accurate) is that we eliminated this type of language in a number of places in the draft in response...