Marcus Saraiva

Results 19 comments of Marcus Saraiva

> Could there be a problem when alternative paths from r5 are transformed in r5r ? Trip legs not well grouped by option ? Indeed, that seems to be the...

Hi @temospena. I did some tests here and the problem is indeed the GTFS, despite the validator saying it's ok. I've unzipped the GTFS, deleted the `frequencies.txt` (which was empty)...

The `shapes.txt` is optional, and route shapes are only used in the `detailed_itineraries()` function to compute travel distances and trip geometries. If you're using any of the other of r5r's...

We noticed that the Minetti function throws those messages, but we are unable to silence them from r5r. But we hadn't noticed that it takes that much longer to compute...

Hi @stupidpupil and @rafapereirabr. I was looking into this, and it looks like we just need to save a `build-config.json` file containing the configurations on the same folder as the...

I have made some tests and indeed R5 looks for a `build-config.json` file in the same folder where the `osm.pbf` and `gtfs` are stored and uses the settings on that...

That's a good ideia. We could include: - current Java version - amount of memory set to Java through the Xmx option

Hi @ACalleros. Sorry about the late response, I've just seen this issue now. I took a quick look at R5's code, and I believe there's a way we can implement...

It's great that you managed to make it work! But stay tuned, we'll let you know once we have a simpler way to achieve this natively through `r5r`.

Hi @temospena. Thanks for the feedback! I've looked into this and found this is an issue upstream in R5 and I cannot fix it from our side in r5r. I...