Tony Murray

This would be very helpful. It would be even more helpful if you could map labels to different responses. That way you could have canned responses for different types of...

Additionally, this is the rrdcreate command: ``` rrdtool create app-mysql-1.rrd --step 300 DS:IDBLBSe:GAUGE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IBLFh:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IBLWn:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:SRows:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:SRange:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:SMPs:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:SScan:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IBIRd:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IBIWr:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IBILg:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IBIFSc:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IDBRDd:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IDBRId:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IDBRRd:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IDBRUd:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IBRd:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IBCd:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000 DS:IBWr:DERIVE:600:0:125000000000...

Interesting, ok.

@oetiker I noticed for some reason we update `-1` values instead of `U` for this rrd even though we defined the min as 0 for all DS. Could this be...

Odd, as changing our update to use U, and graphing now works when using rrdtool - and rrdcached (as long as you don't graphs values updated with -1).

There is a difference between the two, each one should have the same ds' with valid values (>=0) and NaN. Bad entry: ``` 8.3886080000e+060.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+001.8333055732e+004.4991303744e-010.0000000000e+001.4284368281e-010.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+001.0628497657e+010.0000000000e+00NaNNaNNaNNaN4.0000000000e+022.4000000000e+011.3600000000e+020.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+001.0485760000e+061.0313360000e+061.5100000000e+022.3000000000e+010.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+009.0000000000e+008.6533962204e-020.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+003.3582490668e-039.3250460337e-020.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+001.6299317721e-010.0000000000e+004.1375281124e-010.0000000000e+001.4360057684e+000.0000000000e+004.4492815112e+036.2938491803e+031.7462895147e-011.7306792441e-010.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+005.7379228230e+004.7722556030e+000.0000000000e+00 ``` Good Entry: ``` 8.3886080000e+06NaNNaN1.8646782837e+005.3958522812e-010.0000000000e+003.0100002668e-01NaNNaNNaNNaNNaNNaNNaNNaNNaNNaNNaN3.3454287335e+010.0000000000e+00NaNNaNNaNNaN4.0000000000e+022.4000000000e+011.3700000000e+020.0000000000e+00NaNNaNNaN1.0485760000e+061.0313360000e+061.5100000000e+022.3000000000e+010.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+009.6658762100e+007.9860551735e-02NaN0.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+002.7704712728e-022.7832291791e-010.0000000000e+00NaNNaNNaNNaNNaNNaNNaNNaNNaNNaN1.4963567215e-010.0000000000e+005.1010649788e-010.0000000000e+009.1381618287e+000.0000000000e+005.0256250880e+032.4954577989e+041.5716196637e+001.3100482527e-010.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+000.0000000000e+002.7345012600e+014.2815261468e+000.0000000000e+00 ```

I've worked around this on our end. Feel free to close or keep open if you are going to apply a bugfix.

Subfolders may or may not be a good idea, I know netsnmp can have I indexing issues with a lot of mibs. And some idiot mibs use conflicting namespaces.

Looks like it is getting initialized during the registration stack. (choking in the process config step) Could either handle the failure there or try to find what calls the facade...

I suggest you set `auth_ad_debug` and check the ldap queries.