Michał Trojnara

> Thank you, I now see the same results as [@ulrichb](https://github.com/ulrichb) does. Which results exactly? Could you be a bit more specific? > [@mtrojnar](https://github.com/mtrojnar): Why are you so sure that...

Good to know. The report does not clearly state which versions are affected. Please consider reading [How to Report Bugs Effectively](https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html) to prevent future misunderstandings. Please update the issue description...

@olszomal Can you take a look? We never use `X509_get_ex_new_index()` in libp11, so a crash in ```C CRYPTO_free_ex_data(CRYPTO_EX_INDEX_X509, ret, &ret->ex_data); ``` in OpenSSL's `crypto/x509/x_x509.c:85` does not feel right. This issue...

@dengert Can you elaborate on why you think that `RSA_set_ex_data()` triggers a crash in `CRYPTO_free_ex_data(CRYPTO_EX_INDEX_X509, ...)`? `RSA` and `X509` are separate data types. I'd rather expect a crash in `CRYPTO_free_ex_data(CRYPTO_EX_INDEX_RSA,...

Do you need it hard enough to sponsor PKCS#11 devices with PQ mechanisms for testing?

> I need 3.2 spec with PQ mechs, too. Is there any update or plan for using latest pkcs#11 version (v3.2)? Yes, we will investigate supporting recent PKCS#11 versions in...