Maxime Tréca

Thanks a lot for the feedback everyone! @minad I did not know you could provide your own annotation function in `completing-read`. That is great news as I can indeed remove...

One limitation of marginalia and providing completion annotations is that the annotations are not matchable when selecting a candidate. For instance, if one of the entries is displayed as ```...

@minad Yes this is what I am going for. it is actually easier than what I thought it was going to be. This snippet does proper completion matching, leverages built-in...

@minad Agreed. Could you explain a bit further how I can shortcut the embark dependency by "providing the keymap and the actions as commands. " ?

No I did not push the changes yet, I am struggling a little incorporating these changes with the interactive lambda function using `complete-with-action` (my elisp skills are not great). I...

@minad I added your remarks to a new version. My issue is that embark actions do not seem to be recognized anymore.

@bdarcus I am pretty sure candidate ordering is outside of the scope of this project. I personally use [prescient](https://github.com/raxod502/prescient.el) but the [orderless](https://github.com/oantolin/orderless) package is also popular. Did you try a...

> Edit: when the key-map is working, how does one invoke it from the selected candidate? That's a very good question, I am not really sure. By using embark, you...

So, I changed a few things in between iterations. - Since embark is no entirely optional, I renamed the module and function prefixes to `bibtex-actions` - The macro now autonames...

@minad Good catch regarding the use of 'bib' and 'bibtex', this is why my embark actions where not available. I tested the new iteration of this PR and everything seems...