mterada1228

> Thank you @mterada1228 @kou. My current understanding is: this PR will allow RubyGems to remove RDoc specific code, because RDoc will start using RubyGems plugin (its official API) to...

@hsbt, @kou I checked the behavior in the following case. https://github.com/ruby/rdoc/pull/1171#issuecomment-2421606742 When RDoc includes this changes was used as default gem, documents weren't created as you say. #### How to...

@kou Thank you for your [PR](https://github.com/mterada1228/rdoc/pull/1). I think that solution is so nice. I want to try whether it may work or not, but the branch have to merge some...

@kou Sorry, My explanation was so bad... What I wanted is same as one you say. Thank you for your operation. I'll test https://github.com/mterada1228/rdoc/pull/1 later.

@hsbt @kou I merged @kou's proposal https://github.com/mterada1228/rdoc/pull/1. So, in case RDoc is installed as default gem, documents can be created. ## Test ### 1. RDoc is installed as normal gem....

@st0012 > @mterada1228 can you also update the description to reflect the latest changes? Thanks 😄 Thank you for your comment. I changed a description of this PR. Following points...