Mahé

> Btw, I'm wondering why we have to install and check labels in parallel instead of installing the demo app successfully and then running the label checker test? I'm not...

Hey, it's been almost 3 months since we added the https://github.com/cilium/tetragon/labels/more-info-needed label, I will close this issue now, feel free to reopen or comment this if you want to pursue...

> please close this Indeed! Thanks, https://github.com/cilium/tetragon/pull/1916 solves this.

Thanks for the report! I haven't looked into this but I guess the images used here are not multi-arch and might only run on x86. The next step would be...

I think it was fixed by those two PRs: - https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/31373 - https://github.com/cilium/tetragon/pull/2311 Feel free to reopen if it's not the case.

Just for the context, it follows a discussion we had here https://github.com/cilium/tetragon/issues/1595#issuecomment-1766187127. I'll try to reproduce that but really I don't get it since the whole point of using Docker...

I can't reproduce this, is this still an issue for you? I was thinking maybe it was the apt-get source manipulation but you seem to compile on amd64 for amd64...

> Hi @mtardy thanks, this command works: > > ``` > > docker build -t "cilium/tetragon:latest" --build-arg TETRAGON_VERSION=$(make version) > > ``` > > > > However `make image` still...

> Maybe I can collect more info to help investigate it, just let me know what else needed. Can you reproduce this on a system I can quickly spin a...

> Change in Dockerfile ENV BPFTOOL_REV "b01941c8f7890489f09713348a7d89567538504b" -> ENV BPFTOOL_REV "8485b9fba9b3bb3bd311b00632d2d22c0eee2e13" It's working for me is it failing for you with the other REV? on which distrib are you running?