Michael Tietz
Michael Tietz
> @mt-software-de IMO it could be easier to revert the commit in V16 and reapply yours. Do you plan to make a PR for reintroducing the missing pieces in V16?...
@sbejaoui could you please review this PR.
@jbaudoux @rousseldenis re-review this? @lmignon @TDu could you please review this? It would be nice to merge this finally and then FW Port it do v16. https://github.com/OCA/rma/pull/403
@rousseldenis could you please open this PR again?
ping @chienandalu do you have time for a review?
> You should check how it's done in 16.0, and backport it here, as that's a better way to go IMO. Thx. But i can not see any change which...
Here is our scenario. The Customer Support - knows at the beginning how the rma will take place so they can select what pickings - refund should be created So...
@chienandalu and @pedrobaeza now i'm done with my changes. FYI: @jbaudoux
> some remarks Thanks for the review but nothing will happen here in the near future. Due to the recent events in the repo rma, the contribution for this repo...
I my opinion this should also be False for stock.move.line, it should be set by https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-transport/blob/487d71cce434bf0e817909f0208b64ec42de6c4d/shipment_advice/models/stock_move_line.py#L40 and not from a copy.