Marc Suñé
Marc Suñé
@paololucente did you have the chance to look into this failure so that we can decide whether to merge this initial test?
It seems: ``` 85 recordClass( 86 #IN_BYTES=0x1234, 87 #IN_PKTS=0xABC, 88 IN_BYTES=int(0x1234).to_bytes(4, 'big'), 89 IN_PKTS=int(0xABC).to_bytes(4, 'big'), ``` works around the issue: ``` >>> template_flowset = NetflowFlowsetV9( ...: flowSetID=0, ...: templates=[ ...:...
> It doesn't really surprise me that for something named "BYTES" you have to pass bytes. I would've expected b"\x01\x02\x03\x04". I think there is a confusion. `IN_BYTES` (and `OUT_BYTES`) is...
Deleting the original comment, I need further investigation. The above still holds true.
> You're absolutely right, for those types, it very likely should be an int. Thx! The `L4_SRC_PORT`, `L4_DST_PORT` issues was a red herring. I might look into other field types...
Awesome! I will have a look likely this weekend
False positive: ``` Found legacy header guard with __ASSERT_TRACE_FAIL_LEN macro at bpf/tests/scapy.h:135 Found legacy header guards, please replace with #pragma once or add to the exclude list of a false...
/ci-gateway-api