Marek Šuppa

Thanks @aranke! I think we'd be happy to take a look at a PR if you'd be up for putting one together 🙂

@aranke if you are looking for a quick fix, with a different sort of an approach, maybe the `dbt-meta-testing` package might be of some help: https://hub.getdbt.com/tnightengale/dbt_meta_testing/latest/

@Fszta here is to hoping it's gotten much easier to run `dbt-coverage` with DBT Cloud for you 🙂 In fact, if you'd be up for it, I believe it would...

> not sure how to go about comparing artifacts from the last master branch merge with the artifacts from the slim CI run @raphaelvarieras the way we went around it...

I see, thanks @aa-matthias. I guess this would only concern the `unique_combination_of_columns` test though, right? All the others seem to be defined on the column level, which the `dbt-coverage` should...

@Cquad unfortunately I am afraid `dbt-coverage` cannot really be considered a plugin for `coverage.py`. @JackWolverson we do not really have a timeline here but we'd certainly be very enthusiastic about...