Marek Šuppa

Hey @verhey, I am pretty sure we'd be happy to take a look at a PR, if you'd be still willing to put one together 🙂

One other thing to note would be that it seems having a "coverage ignorelist" -- something like `.gitignore`, just for `dbt-coverage` might be of some help in your usecase as...

Thanks for the idea @cedric-orange! It does indeed something worth adding in the future!

@bsstoner to test this out I suggest you do the following: 1. comment out lines 33-35 (check whether installation is happening) 2. reload the extension (this will be perceived as...

@bsstoner hmm, good question. The only way that comes to mind is creating a new, dummy, unlisted extension which will be used just for testing.

Hey @bbrewington, > It would probably be good to instruct the user to run dbt docs generate first If you'd be up for submitting a PR that does that, we'd...

Looks good to me, thanks @bbrewington!

@VDFaller #73 has already been released (in the sense that it's in the `master` branch). That change now applies to all tables, not just the incremental ones.

@Tomme is there anything preventing this from being merged? It does seem like a very useful addition 🙂

Same here.