Mark Karpov

What happened to this use case? Have you discovered that you don't need this or have you implemented this functionality but never opened a PR?

I think the best thing we can do here is to expose more internals of MMark, e.g. in `Text.MMark.Internal` to facilitate custom logic like this. I'm open to a PR...

> as escaped, shouldn't have been part of the word, and so the emphasis span should have been valid Please see here: https://github.com/mmark-md/mmark#mmark-and-common-mark. Character after `_` should have lower "level",...

> I would have expected escaping the markdown significant character to simply mean it wasn't treated as significant, returning it to punctuation. Then other cases would become problematic, e.g. ```...

And where are the archive contents till you write them into a file? In memory? --- I'm not sure what is going on in your example, but the approach seems...

Thank you, I'll look into that.

OK, you can go ahead with PR, but please preserve backward-compatibility in API.

@robertLeeGDM, Let's first see what you've got.

Hi, thanks for the report. I will look at this eventually, but I can't promise anything in the coming 2 weeks. If you figure it out yourself please feel free...

Yes, that's setext headings. As I state [here](https://github.com/mmark-md/mmark#other-differences) > Setext headings are not supported for the sake of simplicity. If we're to support this style of headings, it'll considerably complicate...