Matthew Danish

It's a good question. Initial thought is 'why not?' as the extended parser is meant for such things. Are you intending to make the change?

See `analyseAndCheckTypesWithEnv`

That sounds reasonable, I'm away for the next 5 days so I'll have to take a closer look next week; sorry!

Can you clarify what you meant by > since comments are not included within `[[Block a]]` They should be, as AST node `BlComment`. What may not be included is any...

The reason is that there is a case test in the fixed form lexer that explicitly drops all comments if the legacy parser is running. I do not know the...

Does https://github.com/camfort/fortran-src/pull/103 help you, @ccotter?

The annotation can't be used by the parser, by design, it's parametric.

I wouldn't count on gfortran for sensible/reliable behaviour.

Sorry, just catching up with the flurry. In most languages the natural thing to do is lexical scope here, which means that the second declaration takes precedence. That's how our...