Mike Prorock

ML has a lot of assets that are really interesting and potentially useful to have better defined in schema.org - for sure datasets, and ability to set types around datasets...

something like `(\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2})[A-Z]+(\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}).([0-9+-:]+)` ?

and a more brutal, but probably more correct one: `^([0-9]{4}(?!\d{2}\b))((-?)((0[1-9]|1[0-2])(\3([12]\d|0[1-9]|3[01]))?|W([0-4]\d|5[0-2])(-?[1-7])?|(00[1-9]|0[1-9]\d|[12]\d{2}|3([0-5]\d|6[1-6])))([T\s]((([01]\d|2[0-3])((:?)[0-5]\d)?|24\:?00)([\.,]\d+(?!:))?)?(\17[0-5]\d([\.,]\d+)?)?([zZ]|([\+-])([01]\d|2[0-3]):?([0-5]\d)?)?)?)?$`

Big plus one from mesur.io

> I suggest that we further constrain to ed25519 did:key Highly supported from our side - keeping the conformance testing clean, simple, and as offline as possible is highly desirable

> @msporny we are testing `vc.proof.type` in the API... IMO, having 3 values for that is better than 2. Think we need to be careful to ensure that basic conformance...

> Please consider making delegation a MUST and ignore OAuth altogether. @agropper Implementer hat on here - many of us with actual implementations in the real world have to integrate...

> I’m now arguing for MUST. @agropper implementer hat on - you will receive a principled objection from me on the fact that there is no current readily available and...

@agropper - chair hat on - this topic has been dealt with multiple times without a consensus of the group. This indicates to me, as has been discussed in previous...

> @mprorock - As invited expert on privacy, I'm doing my best. If the chairs feel I'm not serving my role appropriately, they should institute whatever process to remove me...