Matt Prahl
Matt Prahl
> Hi [@mprahl](https://github.com/mprahl), thanks for the fix and the update! > > Just out of curiosity, which path was taken? Are we simply passing any non-specified optional parameters as None...
@ishaan-mehta this was released in KFP 2.5. Could you please try to verify if it resolves your issue?
Thanks for the contribution @muzzlol ! This is looking good. Could you also please add tests?
@alyssacgoins I need to review your PR more indepth when I have a bit more time but I was originally thinking the solution may be something simple like this. To...
The KFP maintainers discussed this and we agree that this should be prioritized. The current thinking is if this was enabled on a task, we'd essentially mark the task as...
@johnwroge awesome! Please feel free to assign your self with a comment with the content `/assign @johnwroge`.
@sathiya06 that's an interesting idea. I think the main thing holding us back is we need to be aligned with the rest of Kubeflow for the Kubernetes versions we support.
I'd be interested in taking a look!