Mridula

Thanks for filing this request! Adding more arguments to [`dockerClient`](https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/jib/tree/master/jib-gradle-plugin#dockerclient-closure) does seem helpful. We're happy to accept contributions if you would like to look into this further.

Thank you for creating this issue and opening the PR @creckord! As mentioned in the PR, we will wait for the CLA to signed to review your contribution.

Thanks for filing the feature request and the contribution @robert-csdisco! We will take a look at it.

Thank you @creckord! Please sign the CLA as described in the comment [above](https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/jib/pull/3709#issuecomment-1189107096) so that we can review your contribution!

> Regarding the setters (and possibly addressing the code coverage issue): would it make sense to remove them instead and have the getters set and expose the two `Property`s, in...

Thanks for providing your workaround @bademux! Glad to know that at least running the jib tasks sequentially worked. We will keep this issue open to gather more information on how...

@tnaroska thanks for your interest! It looks like there were still some risks to making the change when we looking into the implementation. We want to be careful about inadvertently...

@eldo26 - For the first question on scanning images build by the jib task. You could build your image to the docker daemon with jibDockerBuild and use a scanning tool...

Thank you for your contribution! `jib-gradle-plugin`3.3.0, `jib-maven-plugin` 3.3.0 and `jib-core` 0.22.0 have been released with this feature!

Hi @dimovelev, thank you for the feature request! Here are some related discussions: #2130, #1997. Please let us know if you would be interested in exploring further or contributing.