Mouse
Mouse
> I've tested your master with it and everything is OK, it works with my APER. **Perfect!** Thanks!! > When I wrote about PR to my repo I meant only...
@AuthenticEshkinKot I see you've made updates and applied some fixes to this PR - could you please check it against my fork https://github.com/mouse07410/asn1c.git (which merged the original #115), branch `vlm_master`...
@ikarso and @persandstrom, I've noticed that this PR is not quite compatible with PR #129, as the latter introduces larger constraints than this one supports. It seems that the best...
Also, @ikarso, shouldn't the command line flags be updated to accommodate APER vs UPER?
I've "made peace" between this PR and #129. It's in my fork now. Maybe more validation tests are needed to better exercise both APER and longer constraints, but I leave...
> @mouse07410 Do you mean in the converter-sample.c? No, I mean that both PRs (#125 and #129) are applied to my fork of asn1c, *and* the disagreements between them have...
@ikarso your update has been merged, thank you! Perhaps you could add a clean version of #99? ;-)
The merge has been completed. #99 is in the master branch of my fork, all the CI tests pass.
@vgough ...?
@stevenChuCP the compiler got more strict in what it accepts, so the `encfs` code doesn't compile anymore with the recent (current) compilers. Yes, old compilers still let that code pass....