Pete Hodgson

Results 50 comments of Pete Hodgson

`feature_flag.flag_id` or `feature_flag.flag_name` would be less ambiguous, IMHO. (rather than `feature_flag.id`)

Wouldn't we want to standardize an attribute that indicates the evaluated value of the flag? `feature_flag.evaluated_value`, or just `feature_flag.flag_value`?

> The thing I'm missing here is "variant name". @justinabrahms I _think_ what I'm calling "evaluated value" you're calling "variant name", right? Not advocating for one over the other, just...

Oh thanks, the example helps! So "evaluated value" would be the actual value that the Application Author is getting back from the flag decision call, and "variant name" is the...

Anyone feel like adding some basic instructions to the website and sending me a pull request? :)

@siuying already started on this: https://github.com/siuying/Specs/tree/frank/Frank/0.8.8

@subdigital if you can figure out a solution that'd be awesome.

Thanks for reporting this. Can you tell me which version of Frank you're using? Cheers, ## Pete Typed on a little bitty keyboard On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:34 AM,...

Thanks, this definitely looks like a bug. Thanks again for taking the time to report it. Is this a blocker for you? I would assume that you could work around...