moewew

Due to https://github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/917 there is going to be an emergency bugfix release soon. Testing to find any other last-minute bugs in 3.13 would be appreciated. All changes between 3.13 and...

The binaries for Biber 2.14 are being built as we speak, so `biblatex` 3.14 is going to be released soon. The release improves support for `polyglossia` (`polyglossia` version 1.45 or...

Some possible changes to the standard styles are up for discussion at https://github.com/plk/biblatex/pull/1000. Input from style authors and interested users would be highly appreciated.

`biblatex` 3.15 and Biber 2.15 are on their way to release. Most Biber binaries have already been built, but it may take a few days until everything is finalised an...

`biblatex` 3.16 and Biber 2.16 were released on 2020-12-31. This was mostly a bugfix release with only a few interesting changes for style developers and end users. * `\printbibliography` now...

`biblatex` v3.17 and Biber v2.17 are currently being made ready for release The releases include a number of smaller changes, the most interesting additions for end users are probably the...

There is also CSL-JSON, which might be interesting for interoperability with CSL styles: https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema#csl-json-schema. Not sure how different that is from bibjson. Question is if we can map everything Biber...

It seems as though ```latex \def\blx@ifciteidem@strict{% \ifbool{citetracker} {\blx@ifcitesingle {\blx@ifciteidem@global} {\@secondoftwo}} {\@secondoftwo}} \def\blx@ifciteidem@constrict{% \ifbool{citetracker} {\blx@ifcitesingle {\iftoggle{blx@footnote} {\blx@ifmpfncheck {\blx@imc@iffieldequals{fullhash}\blx@lasthash@foot} {\@secondoftwo}} {\blx@imc@iffieldequals{fullhash}\blx@lasthash@text}} {\@secondoftwo}} {\@secondoftwo}} \def\blx@idemtracker@strict{% \blx@ifcitesingle {\blx@idemtracker@global} {\blx@idemreset@global}} \def\blx@idemtracker@constrict{% \blx@ifcitesingle {\blx@mpfnsave \blx@idemtracker@context} {\blx@idemreset@context}}...

Something just occurred to me. 1) Writer: Book 1, Writer: Book 2 2) Idem: Book 3 is not ambiguous, but the new *strict* feature would make the second citation read...

@pripple Could you do some more testing? Did you find any other cases that need special handling? What do you say about the problematic case I mentioned above?