moewew

All good points. But, @pauloney, forgive me if I misrepresent your intentions, I initially interpreted you first comment to mean that you in general think this request is not a...

I had seen this issue, but it looked like a bigger project that I unfortunately don't have the time for right now. Over the last years, new features have meant...

I'm not sure how feasible it is to get this into core `biblatex` even in the long term. A change of the required dimension would have serious backwards compatibility implications....

On a (superficial) user level a new option whose pre-set value corresponds to the status quo is pretty unproblematic. But the issue is that the implementation of that option would...

The TeX.SX questions you linked predate `biblatex-ext` by quite a few years (I think the newest question was from 2014, the first public release of `biblatex-ext` was in 2018). But...

I'm not too fond of the idea of mentioning certain third-party styles/packages in the official documentation. For one I feel it creates the impression of an endorsement. It would be...

Since we already have `@dataset` I think it would be a bit odd to use `@incollection` (which is really in a `@collection`) for something that is "in a `@dataset`". So...

Do you have a concrete idea of what the output would look like for such a relation? Are you thinking about the `related` functionality or are you referring to a...

Here is a slightly modified version of `related:default` (which is what both `reprintas` and `reprintof` in the previous code example use) that also suppresses the `title` if they are the...

I think something along those lines might be a useful addition (and it won't impact backwards compatibility). But at the moment the code feels a bit *ad-hoc*. It is tricky,...