ModelicaSpecification
ModelicaSpecification copied to clipboard
modelica
Specification of the Modelica Language
This is MCP-0029 _License Export_. Currently in _Draft_ state to reflect state of being under development. This PR is the continuation of the issue #2217.
When I read the definition of `smoothOrder`, it looks like a mechanism that allows a function call to be automatically augmented with a `smooth(…)` wrapper. The non-normative explanation, on the...
One can try to address the need to debug models using homotopy with this kind of wrapper functions. ```modelica model TestHomotopy Real y1, y2; function tilHomotopy "Extended TIL Homotopy function"...
Can binary operators like `+` be applied to records? Trying to find some explanation for #3139 and I find that the whole explanation of whether binary operators can be used...
It seems odd that we don't give a complete list of supported bitmap formats: https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/blob/a61982fa6be2f8e6e071bc9ea468a39be77cebb8/chapters/annotations.tex#L1015-L1017 Shouldn't we simply replace _include_ by _are_?
Closes #2952. This PR is the continuation of #2962 that didn't go in the direction of addressing the problem which #2952 was all about, namely the portability between tools of...
Remove the empty experiment and define it using a record instead (per discussions). Closes #2985
The need for formalization of _evaluable parameter_ is far from new, and has recently come up again in different issues: - #2602 – Clean definition of variability insides initial sections...