Modestas Vainius

Looks like the issue is when `/32` subnet is specified for also-proxy. E.g., I want to access IP `10.118.0.3`. If I add '`10.118.0.3/32`, subnet is present in `ip addr`: `ip...

It would be great to have this PR integrated asap. I see that PR also adds base64 to -J which is great. RIght now -J is broken with binary data...

Why don't we revert https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules/pull/4894 but do the same workaround for `node_pool` instead. I have already tested this approach, it works. I know it is not optimal but at least...

@JeremyOT, @mastersingh24 Fair enough that your approach looks better. If @JeremyOT PR works, setting `cluster_autoscaling.auto_provisioning_defaults.service_account` makes much more sense then messing with `node_pools` which I did in https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules/pull/6611. Not that...

What I did on systemd system (Debian unstable): Created `/etc/systemd/system/[email protected]` file based on nice recommendations in [Arch Wiki "suspend/resume" and "Combined Suspend/resume service file" chapters](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Power_management#Suspend.2Fresume_service_files). ``` [Unit] Description=Stop/Restart kbfs before...

`python-gnupg` in Debian is patched to default to `gpg1` since even `python-gnupg 0.3.9` [gnupg 2.1 support is pretty poor and buggy](https://bitbucket.org/vinay.sajip/python-gnupg/issues/32/add-gpg-21-compability) (package does not build against gpg 2.1 with tests...

Agentless mode should probably work. However, gpg-agent in gpg 2.1 is vastly different and backwards incompatible with gpg1 (as far as I can tell, there is no gpg1 gpg-agent in...