Gregg Reynolds
Gregg Reynolds
> Could you give an example of what you mean by 'formal syntax of messages'? E.g. the PR description shows a possible message: > > ``` > # let x...
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 8:20 PM Gregg Reynolds ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi Tim! > > Thanks for posting this issue. FYI, after several years working on the >...
Yep, sorry, that's a documentation problem. I'll get something written this weekend. On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 8:40 PM Tim McGilchrist ***@***.***> wrote: > I have looked at both...
working on it...
> @mobileink have you been able to work on this? Deepest apologies. I guess I was more burned out than I realized - got started on other stuff and completely...
Sorry, I just noticed this. I'll be releasing new code soon and will include this fix.
ok, default for `--@ppx//debug` was true, which caused `-runtime-variant d` to be added to cmd line. TODO: add a flag to control `-runtime-variant`
Either way, we need a way to express this dependency in the language. We can express a dependency on a module, but the `ocaml_module` rule always delivers both a cmi...
Added OCAMLFIND_IGNORE_DUPS_IN to ocaml_module, ocaml_signature, with hardcoded paths to deal with topdirs.cmi, digestif.cmi. TODO: use a build flag to allow user to pass dirs to be ignored.
one way to do this: make `adjunct_deps` a label_keyed_string_dict, and list the modules to be opened in the string value. E.g. something like: ``` adjunct_deps = { "@opam//pkg:sexplib": "Sexplib Sexplib.Std",...