Mark Nottingham
Mark Nottingham
See: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wellknown-uri-review/DsFgDYooRoC9OvRhM8ZNQWb_kj8/ * Requested URI suffix: “cdmi” * Change Controller: SNIA (https://www.snia.org/), [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) * Specification Document: CDMI 2.0.0 - https://www.snia.org/sites/default/files/technical-work/cdmi/release/CDMI-v2.0.0.pdf * Related: See ISO/IEC 17826:2022 - https://www.iso.org/standard/83451.html
Hi, I'm looking at changes to `http_sfv`, and noticed that this library depends upon it. See [a summary of how it would work](https://github.com/mnot/http_sfv/tree/binary-functional#python-api). Basically, it's moving from an object-based approach...
### What is the issue with the Fetch Standard? [RFC 9421](https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9421.html) defines the `Signature` header field. One of its use cases is signing requests, effectively acting as a credential. Because...
This terminology is... odd, and at least for me makes it more difficult than necessary to read the spec. Have you considered alternatives? E.g., * Query cache key * Varied...
The introduction should explicitly point out that this mechanism is only for URLs that use application/x-www-form-urlencoded query strings; other formats aren't supported.