Mark Nottingham
Mark Nottingham
The language in both the guide and the process gives the overwhelming impression that only the Team can actually create a charter: > W3C creates a charter based on interest...
Roughed in in `graph` branch. Not sure if this is really helpful. An [arc diagram](https://observablehq.com/@d3/arc-diagram) might be better.
I was wondering whether it was intentional. E.g., this: > These nominations are confidential to the TAG Appointment Committee. could come into conflict with: > A record of each Formal...
This drifts into the area that people were so concerned about regarding policy discussions. I'd encourage folks to consider if the W3C *needs* to do this sort of thing --...
Just checking in - is this something we consider as part of `director-free` (I can see it through that lens), or separate? Any chance of getting it into `process-2022`?
@samuelweiler incorrect; see [this statement](https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/appeals-actions-decisions/) and the [referenced spec](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026#section-6.5). Basically, any decision in the IETF can be appealed.
@dwsinger there are many tools in the governance toolbox -- resorting to straight voting by the AC is only one option (and it has some serious downsides, as explained). Many...
> The AC review process is far from perfect, and we are not as efficient as if everything were decided by one very active leader with total control over direction....
Could the discussion of what / where the mission and scope of the W3C are be split into a separate issue?
It's an interesting idea.