Mark Nottingham

FWIW - I care less about whether the CG/BG process is in _this_ process document, and more that it's well-defined and usable. Putting it behind a bunch of tabs with...

My .02 - any proposed replacement needs to be back with research as to why it's superior, just as was the case for STV. I strongly suspect that a driving...

> I've shown resistance to the NomCom idea in the past, frankly, because it pushes the problem upstream - someone, somewhere, is "deciding who should be on the slate", and...

It's good to hear the AB has been discussing this, but I very much agree that it needs to involve the wider community, not just be talked about behind closed...

My .02 - I feel like workshops should be able to be convened by the Team and the TAG; that's probably the easiest adjustment. The following need some discussion: *...

We could start by chunking it up into separate issues along the lines of the list above (_Convening workshops_...), but I suspect it's more important to define the potential places...

Since the IAB has been invoked a few times, [this](https://www.iab.org/appeals/) and the link to RFC2026 there might be useful reading. The IAB does have an appeal function, but it's part...

So, if I wanted to, tomorrow I could start a CG called "Process2" and it would have just as much weight as this CG does. As a participant in this...

Not sure what you're saying there @plehegar -- do you mean TPAC was a _lost_ opportunity, or did one go out (I didn't see it)? It's hard to give weight...

That seems reasonable, and I agree that it's not urgent. Depending on the timelines, it might be nice to get in before director-free ships, since that's the biggest change on...