Mateusz Nojek

Nice idea! I need to take a look if it's a low-hanging fruit or it requires significant changes to the code.

> It could be also possible to test if the import is local or external and propose sorting based on that (similiar as python): > > ``` > Library Collections...

Also, I am thinking if this is a good idea to implement this rule. I remember a discussion on slack (probably on #lsp or #devel channel) about the order of...

Another thing that comes to my mind is to create a rule for keeping settings of the same type grouped together, but again... I am not 100% sure if it...

I think I will keep `setting-name-not-in-title-case` as it is and add another rule like `invalid-setting-name` so that we have more precise messages instead of just 'something is wrong with this...

Hey @MoreFamed, I think that this is how the rule works now - it looks for any variable that looks visually differently but is exactly the same variable (as read...

Yeah, this can be done. I think we can just create a new rule so that we will have a more precise description of it.

I would say that the rule should not be too complicated and it should not allow more than 1 line between comments. If we ignore comments, users shouldn't be forced...

Thanks @p74 for reporting this issue. This is due to the fact that we normalize the keyword name before running a rule on it and in this case (`And a...

The problem here is how we discover keyword's library prefix. It's too simple approach and I need to think about something more precise. Gherkin is already supported and it's not...