Matija Nalis

@lodi-g Any luck with EveryDoor intents PR?

Sounds quite interesting, but might have a lot of caveats to implement usefully (in a way that is less likely to damage existing data). - adding route relations is not...

> This is similar to how navigators behave when they guide you along a route (for example, Organic Maps or OsmAnd). In addition to ass-typing noted above, given that EveryDoor...

In that picture of yours, under `Building` row, you can click `...` and choose `ruins`, if that helps?

> [buildings=ruins](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Druins) is also suitable, however, using it we lose the former purpose of the building. That is true. Do note that instead of adding tags like `abandoned=yes`, it would...

> But abandoned:building key is deprecated https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:building Interesting. Somebody seems to have changed wiki definition last year based only on short comment by one other user on talk page, without...

Perhaps it might be best to add two entrance nodes, one on each side, and each with its own address ? Or, one might help bring that [AddrN proposal](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/AddrN) to...

> About nodes with only addresses: as for me, I don't like this approach due to questions to final implementation, like mobile apps. Can you clarify what is the (perceived?)...

> It is subjective, but as for me, node upon a building doesn't show a relation to the building at all. It's just a node. And just a building. It...

> Some datasets probably don't make sense, eg buildings. I agree, building shape is very hard and time consuming to determine from the ground. Building datasets are much better integrated...