Marcelo Bezerra
Marcelo Bezerra
I will try to review it and see if some other users can give feedback as well. Thank you for you effort!
@konstkarapan can you test this with the latest configurator, since we now changed to Electron?
> @DzikuVx Would it be possible to include the SITL executables in the assets on GitHub with the INAV releases? Then we could easily integrate an autoupdater in the SITL...
Hi would you update with the latest changes, so we can consider it for inclusion in 7.0?
Haven't tested yet, but should make it easier to test iNavFlight/inav#9199
#1808 is related to this, as it groups the HUD settings together, to match the hud elements layout of this pull request.
This is what the new section will look like.  Potentially, the crosshair can be moved here as well.
> I would probably change **INAV Radar** to **ESP32 Radar / Formation Flight**. > > It hasn’t been called INAV Radar for a while. That is an easy change. What...
Also, should we move the crosshairs to the HUD section so all related elements are grouped together?
@error414 can you fix the conflict in osd.h?