Maatuq
Maatuq
Hi @jufajardini, I can see that a label was removed at this [PR](https://github.com/OISF/suricata-verify/pull/1620), is that what causes workflow failure or because of wrong format for SV_BRANCH in the description.
Hi Team, Is there anything required from my side for this PR.
I think I'll have to do this for couple of more weeks :D On Fri, May 31, 2024, 00:12 Catena cyber ***@***.***> wrote: > I guess this needs a rebase...
I'm running CentOS Stream 8 and the 3 reported failed tests, pass on that machine.
@IvanNardi any sample capture for this ? I think we can follow https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4571 for this, just tried to find a sample capture to verify the implementation but couldn't find one....
I don't think having static SSRC throughout the session is the case for all RTP sessions for example some apps has a session that starts as stun and then RTP...
> > I don't think having static SSRC throughout the session is the case for all RTP sessions for example some apps has a session that starts as stun and...
- I think it's useful to have such apis as i had a similar experience with a private protocol - some concerns: * how to set a reliable value for...