Michael Lyle

@ABLomas We discussed this on IRC, and this is tiresome. We are planning on doing some things for usability. There's a valid use case for "I'm flying my nav quad...

@ABLomas I'm concerned that we're pretty far afield and talking about things that were not in the original problem-- an invalid configuration. I think right now the way I'm thinking...

> "You wouldn't be allowed to arm with a configuration with inapplicable flight modes" - exactly that's what we are talking about. This limitation only adds complexity ("bring your PC...

This is the real issue with multirotors:  (From a simulation run, where attitude was altered to gate accelerometer data for 300ms after any fast gyro moves). The paradoxical movement...

Could do this; http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Check_whether_your_application_is_running#Using_the_name_of_the_process_.28with_Windows.27_tasklist_command.29 but very low prio.

Could declare the defaults for the uavo as a weak reference in the linker, and let a target override... but then there's the chance that something-not-intended-to-be-overriden could be overridden as...

Yes. The sophisticated autonomous modes are likely to be awhile before we implement them. In the shorter term there's some interest in intermediate modes to ride-out failures (e.g. short times--...

The problem isn't just lack of availability. It's that we have no infrastructure to tell if they are working. We could have a magnetometer error and fly away forever. We...

sorry, yes, mw/bf/cf motor mapping

need to adjust verbiage, too-- right now it implies dR will only do multirotors when it's really just the setup wizard which is multirotor only.