Mike Lissner
Mike Lissner
So: - probably we shouldn't rely on `docket_number_core` for state court docket numbers we don't understand very well. - I don't understand the CA9 example. Their docket numbers should be...
Super helpful analysis. I don't know the solution half as well as you do, but one thing I'll note is that the shorter case names tend to be the better...
Hi @jasonzoladz. I haven't seen that issue with Postgresql indexes before, but we did recently create some new and fancy indexes over in https://github.com/freelawproject/courtlistener/issues/3543. That was back in December though,...
The manual dump of the data is underway. I'll try to keep an eye on it. Sorry it didn't work automatically. I'm not sure what's up with that, but I...
> I did (and spent six hours trying to get it to work). However, I'm no postgres wizard. So, one fix is to just drop the index. That should get...
Seems like we're all good here?
Thank you @jbgolds! This is another one for slow review, but we'll get to it soon. Thank you!
@jbgolds just wanted to make sure you saw the review come in on this one.
One more example of this here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69398899/1/ferris-v-amazoncom-services-llc/ Let's make sure it's fixed too, then merge this. If it's possible, we should reprocess all the ones we've missed too. Maybe a...
@albertisfu, the script you've got in [your comment](https://github.com/freelawproject/courtlistener/pull/5484#issuecomment-3177500494) — it'd be easier if you just ran it yourself, so I opened a ticket to grant you and Eduardo access to...