Mike Lissner

Results 1710 comments of Mike Lissner

Yikes, well that's a heck of a query, but we don't actually need a list of all the events do we? I think what's most useful is to have a...

Neat! Here's Miranda v. Arizona (a popular case): https://www.courtlistener.com/admin/pghistory/events/?method=tracks&obj=search.OpinionCluster:107252&back=/admin/search/opinioncluster/107252/change/ It looks like it has about 2000 updates, each updating the citation count. Sort of feels like we might want to...

Nice. Can you create an issue or three for these, please?

Yes, I think we'll want to collect this info. It's esoteric, but important if you're trying to understand the case. Good find.

Thanks Josh. @flooie, can you fold this into your big redesign PR and change it to a split button like we have for RECAP? ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/276a1397-20ed-4eea-b2a2-cd25dec15f65) We currently have a few...

We did pagerank many years ago, but discovered it favored older cases too much and was generally not great for relevancy. So when we moved to a more distributed architecture,...

Sounds great. We can document the above and then return the score accordingly. Two other things that are in the pipeline for our relevancy engine that we might want to...

This issue is about providing the scores in the API. Did you mean this one, about relevancy decay: https://github.com/freelawproject/courtlistener/issues/558

Got it! We need to spin this into a separate issue. This one is just about returning the value, not computing or using it. I'll get that going and copy...

Thanks for the bump, Ben. You're right, we should do the basic version first. I'll get it on Alberto's backlog. Our backlogs are growing instead of shrinking right now though.