mlell
mlell
Could it be enough to handle this as git submodules? That would delegate the task of updating, leaving just the task on how to define and satisfy the dependencies of...
While thinking about how to structure a possible lesson about `purrr`, the [new features of dplyr 1.0.0](https://www.tidyverse.org/blog/2020/06/dplyr-1-0-0/) kept crossing my mind. Most importantly, * `rowwise()` is no longer discouraged, albeit...
> Is a functional programming lesson being worked on somewhere? @blongworth @StoianAndrei I just saw this R lesson in the making which takes a dplyr-first approach and also introduces purrr....
OK, @jcoliver, please let me know if there is anything I can do to facilitate your work, like better comparisons before/after or so.... I'm on vacation the next 2 weeks...
@jcoliver This is a proposed solution, among other things: #737 : Get rid of factors
Maybe `base::addTaskCallback()` is for you?
@gaborcsardi hm, yes that seems so, but could one just take the end of the previous call as starting point of the next one? That would provide timings at least...
@krzjoa the package [*box*](https://github.com/klmr/box) provides modules and sub-modules. The barrier to start a module is much lower than to start a package, but it lacks the versioning and distribution mechanisms...
Hi, I stumbled across this issue again. I am confused that it does not pop up for you. I copied your commands but I changed the invocation of `datalad create...
Thanks for spending the time to look into this, @naupaka and @matthieu-bruneaux , and nice to see that you found it useful!