Martin Kuemmel

Sure, I am aware that SE++ can't do it right now, but the user (--> @louisquilley ) can do it, in principle. All necessary information is available.

That parameter doe not exist, right. I am not aware we ever discussed this. I'll have a look. If it does not exist it shouldn't be difficult to implement. Could...

That parameter to make the detection threshold absolute for CHI2 images does not exist yet, and we will implement it for the next version v0.17. Until then you can: *...

@hjmcc I checked you images, the weight image is 1.0 everywhere, hence the detection threshold **is** absolute as expected for a chi-square image. This zip file: [chi2.zip](https://github.com/astrorama/SourceXtractorPlusPlus/files/7993809/chi2.zip) contains the configuration...

Some comments from my side: - In the first image the SE++ objects seem to be larger and the additional 20% objects are at the faint end. Maybe the min-area...

Set: - core-threshold-value to your 'old' detection-threshold; - core-minimum-area equal to detection-minimum-area; - lower the value for detection-threshold; - switch on the partitioning with partition-corethreshold=0 The objects get larger which...

Well, this is really a comment. This functionality kind of exists via the parameter "flux_scale_keyword", no? Maybe that parameter could be generalized in the sense that if the given value...

Hi @JPCalderon both ways do work. You can either provide *one* ZP in the python configuration file and then regulate between bands with the FLUX_SCALE keyword. Personally I have not...