Martin Kuemmel

It's a bit confusing: * the factor 1000 in the bad measurements comes from the detection images, meaning it does not start fitting at all and just reports the starting...

I ran the same dataset with levmar and with gsl and crossmatched the results. When plotting the relative difference between the initial flux and the fitted flux it looks like...

I am afraid we need @marcschefer to solve this, but he just started his vacation. He'll be back in August.

They all have in levmar: "7 - stopped by invalid (i.e. NaN or Inf) "func" values; a user error " There are NAN's in the image file and 0 in...

@louisquilley and @vdelapparent, I have applied for a focus demo at this years [ADASS conference](https://www.adass2022.ca/). If granted it would be great to present there also your user generated models. I...

True, also `FreeParameter(1.0, Range((1.0e-07,1.0e+05), RangeType.EXPONENTIAL))` show large offsets at bright mags that I do not really understand.

@andalenavals Yep, looks like you run on conda, and there it is *really* worth setting those variables. That could reduce the run times by quite a factor! Also using v0.14...

Looks like you have to still throw in some objects, otherwise your 64 cores get bored.

Just to add my two cents. In the use cases with a separation between the morphology bands and the photometry bands two subsequent SE++ runs could do the job, with...

> The most critical feature being the ability to use values from the ASSOC catalog as initial/fixed values or priors. Does that mean that right now the parameters of the...