Martin Kouba

@michalvavrik @sberyozkin @geoand I haven't had time to look into the details yet but is the `InterceptedMethodBindingFilter` about ignoring an interceptor binding annotation instance? If so would an annotation transformer...

> but we should keep the annotation in place as the developers will count on it. what if they will bind their own interceptors to it. It's dodgy. Or did...

Ok, I get the idea but I really don't get why it's needed. I mean why do we need to keep the annotations anyway? Also I don't think it's very...

Georgios is right, we'll need a simple reproducer. Also what kind of rest client do you use? BTW the usage of CDI interceptors on interfaces is somewhat non-standard, from the...

> may be desired, especially in case of `CompositeIndex` Could you be more specific? TBH I find the fact that a `CompositeIndex` may contain multiple ``ClassInfo``s (same or different) of...

I also think that the annotation transformers API from Quarkus should not be incorporated into Jandex, or at least not incorporated into the `Index` class hierarchy. It was designed as...

Well, the "correct" way would be to handle the class hierarchies correctly, which is not an easy thing to do. I.e. you would have to filter out beans that override...

> I think what Martin meant is that every MediatorConfiguration would carry an information about Bean instead of the class of that bean. Exactly. > @mkouba in such case you...

+1 and make sure it's documented.

I'm investigating the `AnnotationServletTestCase` failure. It's related to this [piece of code](https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/blob/main/independent-projects/arc/runtime/src/main/java/io/quarkus/arc/impl/ArcContainerImpl.java#L227-L237).