Matthias Köppe

> I'll set up a workflow on GH Actions to test these downstream packages. The first green checkmarks (for tests that are not affected by the above) can be seen...

With mingw-w64-python-passagemath-environment 10.6.38-2 and mingw-w64-python-passagemath-repl 10.6.38-2 now available, I am re-running tests at https://github.com/passagemath/passagemath/actions/runs/19771134223

Confirming that the issue with "launcher_dir" is resolved by #26593.

The next issue is a bug on our side (https://github.com/passagemath/passagemath/issues/1824), which is fixed in https://github.com/passagemath/passagemath/releases/tag/passagemath-10.6.39, expected to be on PyPI by tomorrow.

10.6.39 is up now

Thanks a lot @striezel and @lazka. These changes to the shebang lines are fine. In particular, replacing `sage-python` by `python` matches what `pip` does when installing the package.

@striezel Now with 10.6.39, real tests are being run in my downstream tests on GH Actions, for example: - homfly (all tests pass) https://github.com/passagemath/passagemath/actions/runs/19788086989/job/56698291839?pr=1842#step:4:231 - combinat (test failures similar to...

> > * combinat (test failures similar to testing with my Windows wheels) https://github.com/passagemath/passagemath/actions/runs/19788086989/job/56698291797?pr=1842 > > The relevant output there ends with > > ``` > File "sage/rings/real_mpfr.pyx", line 3699,...

> > * nauty (test failures that might indicate problems of the MSYS2 nauty package; I don't have [Build Windows wheels for passagemath-nauty passagemath/passagemath#1089](https://github.com/passagemath/passagemath/pull/1089) ready so I cannot compare it)...

> > * combinat (test failures similar to testing with my Windows wheels) https://github.com/passagemath/passagemath/actions/runs/19788086989/job/56698291797?pr=1842 > > The relevant output there ends That it *ends* there is a real bug, but...