Marc

Can this issue be closed? It seems to be solved.

Without reading the comment from @jbtronics I have done it the way he proposed. So, I think it's at least a bit intuitive. I did it the following way: 1....

> I second this functionality. > > I think having a built in way to make a part have unique serial number for each part instance would be useful. For...

I have tried it also the way you described (steps 1 & 2) and when I have a look at the Properties it seems like the last letter of the...

So, should I close this issue as it is already planned? @jbtronics The feature you've mentioned is already work in progress in the branch https://github.com/Part-DB/Part-DB-server/tree/settings-bundle, right?

With Version 2.0.2 and the settings now accessible/changeable in the web interface this issue is now resolved.

I witnessed the same with duplicate parameters. The error message was displayed at the position of an parameter that was below the duplicate parameters. Maybe an array index problem?

Hi LuanVorle, I think you should move this to [Discussions](https://github.com/Part-DB/Part-DB-server/discussions) because this is not a bug or a enhancement proposal for Part-DB. And please close this issue. But let me...

I wonder if this was already possible in the legacy version of Part-DB (see [https://docs.part-db.de/upgrade_legacy.html#missing-features](https://docs.part-db.de/upgrade_legacy.html#missing-features))? Just a week ago I added a file type for 3D file formats in our...

And Chat-GPT can help you in creating that list. For me it was quicker than writing my own script or come up with an excel equation and create an excel...