Michael Krabbe Borregaard
Michael Krabbe Borregaard
Yes. But maybe I should clarify - my question was not "do you want this implementation?" but rather "should we include an Abstract Interface to this?". I'm a little unclear...
I think that looks quite complete in terms of base attributes. But, is it worth thinking of `grid` and `raster` as different things (as I suggested above)? They classically are,...
The issue about storing time is also something we're discussing a lot in the context of SpatialEcology.jl. WRT the index ordering, that seems like an aspect of implementation rather than...
No not at all mothballed but EcoBase just contains abstract types and functions on them - no implementation. A constructor needs the concrete implementation of the type, thus I thought...
Everything suffers a bit from me being a bit out of circulation as I'm writing a brand new 7-week MSc course starting in 13 days.
This should use the new Tables interface.
Oh, thanks, yes I think i abandoned those over using `view` but maybe that's not the best approach.
I see a number of ways to change this, but let me ask you: what would you expect to get from `com[1:3,1]`? A 3x1 `Matrix{Float64}`? or a `ComMatrix` with 3...
Thanks guys, that's helpful. After thinking about it I think it makes the most sense to have ComMatrix behave like a regular Array (which involves dropping dimensions, in this case...
Yes, `view` should be able to do that exactly. I like the `sitenames!` function, will implement.