Markus KARG
Markus KARG
@wenshao Why did you remove UTF16::compress from your proposal? Wasn't it providing the expected benefit?
While `mvn validate` passes successfully, I'd like to keep this PR in draft mode until I found the time to actually run a performance benchmark with SAXON, to see that...
As announced recently, here is the benchmark result (please find the source code, build script, and test data [attached](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23263763/SaxonSandbox.zip) ). Results are test iterations per second: * [4.0.6-RI](https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaxb-ri/tree/4.0.6-RI) without Saxon:...
@lukasj Kindly requesting your review. :-)
Feel free to open an alternative PR if you think that yours is in any case better than mine. In the end, I am happy with *any* solution, as long...
Again, I do not care *which* solution is picked, so I am okay with you opening another PR and closing mine in turn - as long as we see *any*...
@eclipse-ee4j/ee4j-jaxb-impl-committers Kindly asking for review / merge. 🙂
I wonder why nobody reviewed this several weeks old PR?
Not only they are busy / off, they also do not *respond* (like "will look into this in Q1"), which is kind of problematic, in particular for the project *lead*....
For such cases, the EF proposes to have *multiple* project leads. Maybe time to elect one?