Markus KARG

Are you still interested in this contribution?

@dibog Kindly requesting your response! :-)

Thank you for your quick answer, Dieter. In fact I do not see the benefit of `valueOf` for the reason outlined in https://github.com/cbeust/jcommander/issues/395#issuecomment-337334608. Anyways, thank you for contributing to JCommander....

@JaumeRibas I assume you mean https://github.com/cbeust/jcommander/blob/2d3fc624514fd7ca9e99dd5b2b06ab274495ebb6/src/main/java/com/beust/jcommander/JCommander.java#L67 Could you please provide a PR that makes the class public and that proofs the usefulness of doing so? Thanks. Edit: Maybe it might...

I think we should go with the interface. Will you provide a PR?

If your posting is intended to be a question, then please post it on https://groups.google.com/g/jcommander. If your posting is intended as a bug report, then please post a unit test...

> Confirmed that 1.83 works as expected. Thank you for your confirmation! :-)

We should change the intended design then, as throwing away useful data and then duplicating the wrong frames eight times makes the "Slower > 1/8" function simply **useless**. Nobody wants...

I do not see why some _manufacturer_ should do that as it is just a design flaw of openshot. You can produce smooth slomo with e. g. ffmpeg already (I...

Maybe you didn't see my official introduction back then. I am already a contributor to this project (working on effects mostly), and I am professional developer in my day job.