Matthew Kay
Matthew Kay
What remains here is post-CRAN (mostly MCMCglmm stuff, which I am punting to post-CRAN), so I am removing the CRAN milestone from this for now
I like the idea of `spread_draws()` without arguments giving `tidy_draws()`-like output. Made an issue here: #200 I see the potential value of a more tidyverse-style NSE in spread_draws/gather_draws, but there's...
> I think the intention makes sense. However, in a Stan model, the `[` notation is for using indices, not declaring them. Indices are declared separately via the `for` loop...
Ah, good question. I think there are pros and cons either way... **Pros / cons of putting [fitted|predicted]_draws.gam in `gratia`:** Pros: - Does not duplicate functionality / just one function...
Okay I hacked something together for the continuous case based on the example in the tidy-brms vignette: ```r probs = ppoints(21) mtcars_clean %>% data_grid(mpg = seq_range(mpg, n = 150)) %>%...
Yeah I think this could also be used for nominal models. That faceted plot (and the Twitter conversation that led to it) was part of the impetus for this issue...
This could be useful! I'm not totally clear on the difference between this and `stat_density_2d`, is it the parameterization in terms of desired mass inside the contour? (it's not immediately...
Makes sense. Okay yeah, I'd be happy to have something like this. I think it would be good if it was similar to stat_lineribbon in that: - it can provide...
Great, thanks!
Moving this issue to {ggdist} as all the geoms and stuff have been moved there.