Matthew (Matt) Jeffryes

Thanks for filing this issue @dbouclier; I'll add this to our backlog.

Thanks for the suggestion @tabern; getting the right trade off of simplicity and control in the higher-level components is always a challenge. I agree that the availability zones restriction for...

Reproduced this by extracting from one of our examples here: [Reproduced · mjeffryes/nodejs-repros@19d9d9d](https://github.com/mjeffryes/nodejs-repros/commit/19d9d9dd54afd388578c76bc0658c2ca016110ee)

Due to lack of tests in this repo and the age, we're not in a good position to move this PR forward so closing for now.

Yes, that's a limitation of the current design I believe. We explicitly pin the underlying provider version here: https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-awsx/blob/master/awsx/package.json#L23C6-L23C6 I can understand the desire to use an alternate version, but...

@danielrbradley The code that works around this is at https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws-native/blob/683a0d77348cde143f7d79b33aa07b9119111bcc/provider/pkg/schema/gen.go#L1060 It's been a while since I touched this, but it looks like maybe the only problem here is that we...

Hi @paf-dev, the `Union` type is defined in the shared dotnet SDK [here](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-dotnet/blob/8f1dd5e358a18aa8ac3f034dcb22818f2fa77e36/sdk/Pulumi/Core/Union.cs#L41) The reason the code example doesn't explicitly instantiate it is that `Union` provides implicit conversions [link](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-dotnet/blob/8f1dd5e358a18aa8ac3f034dcb22818f2fa77e36/sdk/Pulumi/Core/Union.cs#L65), so...

Thanks for filing this one @ttvrdon. I agree it's probably related to the root cause for #3015 in that these are both issues where we're missing the full type for...

I had to hunt around a bit to find a region where I could get azure to let me provision this at all, but I did manage to get a...

Thanks for the bug report @rpmccarter and pointing out the `askDefinitionArgs.memory` workaround.