Markus Jacobsen
Markus Jacobsen
Are you using [swagger-codegen](https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-codegen) for the API generation? We use [openapi-generator](https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator) , which seems to be the more up to date OpenAPI generator. An async Python client can easily be...
> But I personally do not allow any more Pydantic V1 integrationd without shims for v2 Yeah exactly, which is part of what makes our generation complicated. It looks like...
> > Are you using [swagger-codegen](https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-codegen) for the API generation? We use [openapi-generator](https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator) , which seems to be the more up to date OpenAPI generator. An async Python client can...
> Please split this PR. One for bumping the library (and all changes needed to support that new version (not the changes needed for new features made possible for that...
@emontnemery yeah sorry about that. The improvements that you mentioned have now been merged into the dev branch through other PRs as mentioned.
> A few comments. > > Should we maybe split this PR to an initial PR which adds only the standard Home Assistant service API for creating groups and a...
I've made a smaller PR with support for Home Assistant grouping https://github.com/home-assistant/core/pull/123020
I've added the missing method and testing for the new code.
Is there anything I can do to get this accepted?
> Looks really awesome! Thank you so much!!! > > That just leaves the last thing to do which is to add tests for each of the async websocket methods....