Mislav Marohnić

Thanks a lot! I also had a code spike locally for adding descriptions, so I have added it to your PR. Please take a look before you spend time implementing...

Interesting; thanks for reporting this. Yes, I think hub should just ignore a branch that was removed since the `sync` operation was started.

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 00:39, ahutch wrote: > The data from the link (data-ajax=false) is not copied/carried across to > the form meaning that the other frameworks will...

@chelnak It's a solid proposal, but I'm thinking of a better solution to having each individual extension bake their version number in: since GitHub CLI knows the version number (or...

This wasn't solved; that's the reason this issue is still open. Pushing a git tag is still required for this action to function. The idea is that it might be...

We'd need more info to know what's going on there. 1. Is your extension upgraded to the latest version of `go-gh`? 2. Is `gh` in your PATH and up to...

Thanks for suggesting this change. I generally support the idea, but I'd like to first ship rbenv 1.0 and other PRs to this repo before this one.

Rbenv 1.0 has shipped and we could use this feature. Could you rebase your PR so it's mergeable? Thanks!

What's the status of PATH at the time when you invoke `rbenv each`? Is there a version of Ruby whose `bin` directory is already pushed to the front of the...

I found evidence of other people having this exact issue in the past; I'm not sure if it was ever solved for them: https://github.com/rbenv/homebrew-tap/issues/4#issuecomment-1090850799 Apparently `gcc -M` should be equivalent...